The distribution amplitude of the $\eta_c$-meson at leading twist from Lattice QCD
Beno\^it Blossier, Mariane Mangin-Brinet, Jos\'e Manuel Morgado, Ch\'avez, Teseo San Jos\'e

TL;DR
This paper presents the first lattice QCD calculation of the $ ext{η}_c$-meson distribution amplitude at leading twist, providing a relativistic, non-perturbative insight into its structure and comparing it with other theoretical approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a novel lattice QCD method to compute the $ ext{η}_c$-meson distribution amplitude at leading twist, addressing systematic uncertainties and connecting Euclidean lattice results to Minkowski space.
Findings
Significant deviations from Dyson-Schwinger results at small Ioffe times.
First relativistic lattice determination of the $ ext{η}_c$ distribution amplitude.
Comparison with non-relativistic QCD highlights differences in meson structure.
Abstract
Distribution amplitudes are functions of non-perturbative matrix elements describing the hadronization of quarks and gluons. Thanks to factorization theorems, they can be used to compute the scattering amplitude of high-energy processes. Recently, new ideas have allowed their computation using lattice QCD, which should provide us with a general, fully relativistic determination. We present the first lattice calculation of the -meson distribution amplitude at leading twist. Starting from the relevant matrix element in discrete Euclidean space on a set of CLS ensembles, we explain the method to connect to continuum Minkowski spacetime. After addressing several sources of systematic uncertainty, we compare to Dyson-Schwinger and non-relativistic QCD determinations of this quantity. We find significant deviations between the latter and our result even at small Ioffe times.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
