Bayesian Methods to Improve The Accuracy of Differentially Private Measurements of Constrained Parameters
Ryan Janicki, Scott H. Holan, Kyle M. Irimata, James Livsey, Andrew, Raim

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian approach using rejection sampling to produce more accurate and constraint-satisfying differentially private estimates of population parameters, improving data utility while maintaining privacy guarantees.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian method with rejection sampling to ensure constrained, precise, and privacy-preserving data estimates under differential privacy.
Findings
Estimates satisfy known constraints
Enhanced precision over original noisy data
Maintains formal privacy guarantees
Abstract
Formal disclosure avoidance techniques are necessary to ensure that published data can not be used to identify information about individuals. The addition of statistical noise to unpublished data can be implemented to achieve differential privacy, which provides a formal mathematical privacy guarantee. However, the infusion of noise results in data releases which are less precise than if no noise had been added, and can lead to some of the individual data points being nonsensical. Examples of this are estimates of population counts which are negative, or estimates of the ratio of counts which violate known constraints. A straightforward way to guarantee that published estimates satisfy these known constraints is to specify a statistical model and incorporate a prior on census counts and ratios which properly constrains the parameter space. We utilize rejection sampling methods for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
