From super-Earths to sub-Neptunes: Observational constraints and connections to theoretical models
L\'ena Parc, Fran\c{c}ois Bouchy, Julia Venturini, Caroline Dorn,, Ravit Helled

TL;DR
This study updates the exoplanet catalog to analyze the mass-radius relationship, revealing continuous populations of super-Earths and sub-Neptunes across different star types, and explores their formation and structural differences.
Contribution
It introduces new mass-radius relationships, compares exoplanet populations around different spectral types, and investigates the transition between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes.
Findings
No clear gap between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes in composition or radius.
Transition mass and radius vary with stellar spectral type.
Sub-Neptunes around M-dwarfs tend to have lower densities.
Abstract
We have updated the PlanetS catalog of transiting planets with precise and robust mass and radius measurements and use this catalog to explore mass-radius (M-R) diagrams. On the one hand, we propose new M-R relationships to separate exoplanets into three populations. On the other hand, we explore the transition in radius and density between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes around M-dwarfs and compare them with those orbiting K- and FG-dwarfs. Using Kernel density estimation method with a re-sampling technique, we estimated the normalized density and radius distributions, revealing connections between observations and theories on composition, internal structure, formation, and evolution of these exoplanets orbiting different spectral types. The 30% increase in the number of well-characterized exoplanets orbiting M-dwarfs compared with previous studies shows us that there is no clear gap in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
