A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for addressing publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using exact likelihood
Taojun Hu, Yi Zhou, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Satoshi Hattori

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel likelihood-based sensitivity analysis method using the Copas t-statistics selection model applied to the bivariate binomial model for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies, effectively addressing publication bias especially in sparse data scenarios.
Contribution
It is the first to apply the Copas t-statistics selection model to the bivariate binomial model in diagnostic meta-analysis, improving bias assessment in sparse data contexts.
Findings
The method performs well in real-world meta-analyses.
Simulation studies show improved bias correction.
Enhanced finite sample properties over previous models.
Abstract
Publication bias (PB) poses a significant threat to meta-analysis, as studies yielding notable results are more likely to be published in scientific journals. Sensitivity analysis provides a flexible method to address PB and to examine the impact of unpublished studies. A selection model based on t-statistics to sensitivity analysis is proposed by Copas. This t-statistics selection model is interpretable and enables the modeling of biased publication sampling across studies, as indicated by the asymmetry in the funnel-plot. In meta-analysis of diagnostic studies, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve is an essential tool for synthesizing the bivariate outcomes of sensitivity and specificity reported by individual studies. Previous studies address PB upon the bivariate normal model but these methods rely on the normal approximation for the empirical logit-transformed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
