Increasing the detectability of long-period and nulling pulsars in next-generation pulsar surveys

TL;DR

This paper evaluates detection methods for long-period and nulling pulsars, demonstrating that combining software techniques enhances survey sensitivity and informs future pulsar search strategies.

Contribution

It compares the effectiveness of FFT, FFA, and SPS methods for detecting long-period and nulling pulsars, highlighting the superior sensitivity of FFA and the limitations of FFT and SPS.

Findings

RIPTIDE's FFA is more sensitive but slower.

PRESTO's FFT shows detection inaccuracies.

SPS is highly sensitive for high S/N nulling signals.

Abstract

Recent discoveries of multiple long-period pulsars (periods ${\sim}10\,$s or larger) are starting to challenge the conventional notion that coherent radio emission cannot be produced by objects that are below the many theorised death lines. Many of the past pulsar surveys and software have been prone to selection effects that restricted their sensitivities towards long-period and sporadically-emitting objects. Pulsar surveys using new-generation low-frequency facilities are starting to employ longer dwell times, which makes them significantly more sensitive in detecting long-period or nulling pulsars. There have also been software advancements to aid more sensitive searches towards long-period objects. Furthermore, recent discoveries suggest that nulling may be a key aspect of the long-period pulsar population. We simulate both long-period and nulling pulsar signals, using the Southern-sky MWA Rapid Two-meter (SMART) survey data as reference, and explore the detection efficacy of popular search methods such as the fast Fourier transform (FFT), fast-folding algorithm (FFA) and single pulse search (SPS). For FFT-based search and SPS, we make use of the PRESTO implementation, and for FFA we use RIPTIDE. We find RIPTIDE's FFA to be more sensitive; however, it is also the slowest algorithm. PRESTO's FFT, although faster than others, also shows some unexpected inaccuracies in detection properties. SPS is highly sensitive to long-period and nulling signals, but only for pulses with high intrinsic signal-to-noise ratios. We use these findings to inform current and future pulsar surveys that aim to uncover a large population of long-period or nulling objects and comment on how to make optimal use of these methods in unison.