Ranking Manipulation for Conversational Search Engines
Samuel Pfrommer, Yatong Bai, Tanmay Gautam, Somayeh Sojoudi

TL;DR
This paper examines how prompt injections can manipulate the ranking of sources in conversational search engines, revealing vulnerabilities and proposing attack methods that can unfairly promote certain products, highlighting the need for improved robustness.
Contribution
It formalizes conversational search ranking as an adversarial problem, introduces a real-world dataset, and develops a tree-of-attacks technique to manipulate rankings, demonstrating transferability to real systems.
Findings
Different LLMs prioritize sources differently.
Tree-of-attacks reliably promotes low-ranked products.
Attacks transfer effectively to state-of-the-art systems.
Abstract
Major search engine providers are rapidly incorporating Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content in response to user queries. These conversational search engines operate by loading retrieved website text into the LLM context for summarization and interpretation. Recent research demonstrates that LLMs are highly vulnerable to jailbreaking and prompt injection attacks, which disrupt the safety and quality goals of LLMs using adversarial strings. This work investigates the impact of prompt injections on the ranking order of sources referenced by conversational search engines. To this end, we introduce a focused dataset of real-world consumer product websites and formalize conversational search ranking as an adversarial problem. Experimentally, we analyze conversational search rankings in the absence of adversarial injections and show that different LLMs vary significantly in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques
