Representation of preferences for multiple criteria decision aiding in a new seven-valued logic
Salvatore Greco, Roman S{\l}owi\'nski

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel seven-valued logic framework derived from rough set theory to enhance preference representation in MCDA, effectively managing uncertainty and imprecision in decision-making.
Contribution
It presents new preference models using seven-valued logic for MCDA, addressing uncertainty and imperfect information with a robust, logic-based approach.
Findings
Effective handling of uncertainty and imprecision in preferences.
Comparison with existing MCDA methods shows advantages.
Illustrative example demonstrates practical applicability.
Abstract
The seven-valued logic considered in this paper naturally arises within the rough set framework, allowing to distinguish vagueness due to imprecision from ambiguity due to coarseness. Recently, we discussed its utility for reasoning about data describing multi-attribute classification of objects. We also showed that this logic contains, as a particular case, the celebrated Belnap four-valued logic. Here, we present how the seven-valued logic, as well as the other logics that derive from it, can be used to represent preferences in the domain of Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding (MCDA). In particular, we propose new forms of outranking and value function preference models that aggregate multiple criteria taking into account imperfect preference information. We demonstrate that our approach effectively addresses common challenges in preference modeling for MCDA, such as uncertainty,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
