Entangled states are typically incomparable
Vishesh Jain, Matthew Kwan, Marcus Michelen

TL;DR
This paper proves Nielsen's conjecture that, in high dimensions, almost all pairs of entangled quantum states are incomparable under local operations and classical communication, highlighting the fundamental differences in their entanglement structures.
Contribution
The paper proves Nielsen's conjecture about the asymptotic rarity of comparable state pairs, connecting quantum entanglement transformations to random matrix majorisation.
Findings
Proves Nielsen's conjecture for large-dimensional quantum states.
Shows the probability of state majorisation tends to zero as dimensions grow.
Confirms related predictions about random matrix spectra and entanglement comparability.
Abstract
Consider a bipartite quantum system, where Alice and Bob jointly possess a pure state . Using local quantum operations on their respective subsystems, and unlimited classical communication, Alice and Bob may be able to transform into another state . Famously, Nielsen's theorem [Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999] provides a necessary and sufficient algebraic criterion for such a transformation to be possible (namely, the local spectrum of should majorise the local spectrum of ). In the paper where Nielsen proved this theorem, he conjectured that in the limit of large dimensionality, for almost all pairs of states (according to the natural unitary invariant measure) such a transformation is not possible. That is to say, typical pairs of quantum states are entangled in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRandom Matrices and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
