Promotional Language and the Adoption of Innovative Ideas in Science
Hao Peng, Huilian Sophie Qiu, Henrik Barslund Fosse, Brian Uzzi

TL;DR
This study analyzes how promotional language in scientific grant proposals correlates with funding success, innovation perception, and subsequent research impact, highlighting its role in effectively communicating scientific merit.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale empirical evidence linking promotional language to funding success, innovation perception, and research impact in science grants.
Findings
Promotional language doubles the likelihood of grant funding.
Promotional language correlates with higher levels of innovation.
It predicts future citation and productivity impacts.
Abstract
How are the merits of innovative ideas communicated in science? Here we conduct semantic analyses of grant application success with a focus on scientific promotional language, which has been growing in frequency in many contexts and purportedly may convey an innovative idea's originality and significance. Our analysis attempts to surmount limitations of prior studies by examining the full text of tens of thousands of both funded and unfunded grants from three leading public and private funding agencies: the NIH, the NSF, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation, one of the world's largest private science foundations. We find a robust association between promotional language and the support and adoption of innovative ideas by funders and other scientists. First, the percentage of promotional language in a grant proposal is associated with up to a doubling of the grant's probability of being…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFocus
