A new standard for the logarithmic accuracy of parton showers
Melissa van Beekveld, Mrinal Dasgupta, Basem Kamal El-Menoufi, Silvia, Ferrario Ravasio, Keith Hamilton, Jack Helliwell, Alexander Karlberg, Pier, Francesco Monni, Gavin P. Salam, Ludovic Scyboz, Alba Soto-Ontoso, Gregory, Soyez

TL;DR
This paper advances the precision of parton shower simulations to NNLL accuracy for event shapes, bridging analytic resummation and shower algorithms, with numerical validation and phenomenological relevance.
Contribution
It introduces a new standard for logarithmic accuracy in parton showers by establishing a relation between NNLL resummation and shower algorithms, validated through numerical tests.
Findings
Achieved NNLL accuracy for a wide class of event-shape observables.
Numerical tests confirm the logarithmic accuracy of three shower variants.
NNLL terms have significant phenomenological impact, aligning with experimental data.
Abstract
We report on a major milestone in the construction of logarithmically accurate final-state parton showers, achieving next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic (NNLL) accuracy for the wide class of observables known as event shapes. The key to this advance lies in the identification of the relation between critical NNLL analytic resummation ingredients and their parton-shower counterparts. Our analytic discussion is supplemented with numerical tests of the logarithmic accuracy of three shower variants for more than a dozen distinct event-shape observables in and Higgs decays. The NNLL terms are phenomenologically sizeable, as illustrated in comparisons to data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
