Progenitor with small reaction networks should not be used as initial conditions for core collapse
M. Renzo, J. A. Goldberg, A. Grichener, O. Gottlieb, M. Cantiello

TL;DR
This paper argues that using progenitors with small nuclear reaction networks as initial conditions in core collapse simulations is problematic because they omit crucial physics, affecting the accuracy of explosion modeling.
Contribution
It highlights the limitations of small nuclear reaction networks in accurately modeling core collapse progenitors and advises against their use in detailed simulations.
Findings
Small NRN progenitors lack essential physics for collapse dynamics
Using small NRN progenitors can lead to inaccurate explosion simulations
Authors recommend more comprehensive initial conditions for core collapse studies
Abstract
Core collapse initial conditions are a bottleneck in understanding the explosion mechanism(s) of massive stars. Stellar evolution codes struggle after carbon burning, and either stop or adopt numerical simplifications missing crucial physics. The use of small nuclear reaction networks (NRN) that account for energy production but bypass weak reactions is typical, but insufficient to study the dynamics of the collapse. We advise against the use of progenitors computed with small NRN in expensive multi-dimensional simulations of core collapse, bounce, (jet formation), and explosion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management
