How pure can we go with adiabatic state manipulation?
Raul A. Santos, Alex Kamenev, and Yuval Gefen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of adiabatic manipulation of dissipative quantum systems with decoherence-free subspaces, revealing how non-adiabatic effects cause purity loss and establishing speed constraints for quantum information processing.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of the slow evolution of dissipative quantum systems under cyclic protocols, deriving a closed-form expression for purity degradation to second order.
Findings
Purity degrades over a period proportional to 1/γT.
Derived a closed-form expression for non-adiabatic corrections.
Identified fundamental speed limitations in dissipative quantum control.
Abstract
Dissipative systems with decoherence free subspaces, a.k.a. dark spaces (DSs), can be used to protect quantum information. At the same time, dissipation is expected to give rise to coherent information degradation outside the DS. Employed to support quantum information platforms, DSs can be adiabatically modified in a way that resembles adiabatic control of coherent systems. Here we study the slow evolution of a purely dissipative system with a spectral gap , characterized by a strong symmetry, under a cyclic protocol with period . Non-adiabatic corrections to the state evolution give rise to decoherence: the evolution within the instantaneous DS is described by a time-local effective Liouvillian operator that leads to purity degradation over a period, of order . We obtain a closed form of the latter to order . Our analysis underlines speed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
