Cross-Rollup MEV: Non-Atomic Arbitrage Across L2 Blockchains
Krzysztof Gogol, Johnnatan Messias, Deborah Miori, Claudio Tessone,, Benjamin Livshits

TL;DR
This paper quantifies non-atomic MEV arbitrage opportunities across Layer-2 blockchains, revealing over 500,000 persistent opportunities with varying profitability, highlighting the significance of cross-rollup arbitrage in blockchain trading.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive measurement of non-atomic MEV opportunities across multiple L2s, introducing a modified LVR metric to accurately estimate arbitrage potential.
Findings
Over 500,000 arbitrage opportunities identified.
Opportunities persist for 10-20 blocks on average.
Arbitrage profit ranges from 0.03% to 0.25% of trading volume.
Abstract
This study quantifies the potential non-atomic MEV on Layer-2 (L2) blockchains by measuring the arbitrage opportunities between cross-rollup and DEX-CEX. Over recent years, we observe a shift in trading activities from Ethereum to rollups, with swaps on rollups occurring 2-3 times more frequently, albeit with lower trade volumes. By analyzing the costs of swap on L2s and price discrepancies cross-rollup and DEX-CEX, we identify more than 500 000 unexplored arbitrage opportunities. In particular, we find that these opportunities persist, on average, for 10 to 20 blocks, necessitating the modification of the Loss Versus Rebalancing (LVR) metric to prevent double-counting. Our findings indicate that the arbitrage opportunities in Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism range between 0.03% and 0.05% of the trading volume, while in the ZKsync it fluctuates around 0.25%.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTransport and Economic Policies · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Insurance and Financial Risk Management
