The Oxford Olympics Study 2024: Are Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games Coming Down?
Alexander Budzier, Bent Flyvbjerg

TL;DR
This study updates the analysis of Olympic Games costs, revealing that costs and overruns are increasing despite reforms, and suggests that better data and forecasting are needed for more affordable future Games.
Contribution
It provides an updated, comprehensive analysis of Olympic cost trends, evaluating IOC reforms and their effectiveness in reducing costs and overruns.
Findings
Olympic costs are significantly increasing over time.
Cost overruns have risen since 2008, reversing previous declines.
Reuse of venues has not effectively reduced costs for recent Games.
Abstract
The present paper is an update of the "Oxford Olympics Study 2016" (Flyvbjerg et al. 2016). We document that the Games remain costly and continue to have large cost overruns, to a degree that threatens their viability. The IOC is aware of the problem and has initiated reform. We assess the reforms and find: (a) Olympic costs are statistically significantly increasing; prior analysis did not show this trend; it is a step in the wrong direction. (b) Cost overruns were decreasing until 2008, but have increased since then; again a step in the wrong direction. (c) At present, the cost of Paris 2024 is USD 8.7 billion (2022 level) and cost overruns is 115% in real terms; this is not the cheap Games that were promised. (d) Cost overruns are the norm for the Games, past, present, and future; they are the only project type that never delivered on budget. We assess a new IOC policy of reducing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance
MethodsAttentive Walk-Aggregating Graph Neural Network
