System-2 Recommenders: Disentangling Utility and Engagement in Recommendation Systems via Temporal Point-Processes
Arpit Agarwal, Nicolas Usunier, Alessandro Lazaric, Maximilian Nickel

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel recommendation framework that distinguishes between utility-driven and impulsive user behaviors by modeling return probabilities with a Hawkes process, aiming to improve content relevance and user satisfaction.
Contribution
It proposes a generative model that separates long-term utility effects from short-term impulsive interactions using temporal point processes, enabling better content optimization.
Findings
Effective disentanglement of System-1 and System-2 behaviors demonstrated on synthetic data.
Long-term user return probability correlates with utility-driven interactions.
Model provides a foundation for optimizing recommendations based on true user utility.
Abstract
Recommender systems are an important part of the modern human experience whose influence ranges from the food we eat to the news we read. Yet, there is still debate as to what extent recommendation platforms are aligned with the user goals. A core issue fueling this debate is the challenge of inferring a user utility based on engagement signals such as likes, shares, watch time etc., which are the primary metric used by platforms to optimize content. This is because users utility-driven decision-processes (which we refer to as System-2), e.g., reading news that are relevant for them, are often confounded by their impulsive decision-processes (which we refer to as System-1), e.g., spend time on click-bait news. As a result, it is difficult to infer whether an observed engagement is utility-driven or impulse-driven. In this paper we explore a new approach to recommender systems where we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProduct Development and Customization
