Evidence for five types of fixation during a random saccade eye tracking task: Implications for the study of oculomotor fatigue
Lee Friedman, Oleg V. Komogortsev

TL;DR
This study identifies five distinct fixation types during a saccade task, showing how fixation durations and types change over time, indicating declining oculomotor performance and fatigue effects.
Contribution
It introduces a novel five-type classification of fixations during saccades and models their frequency changes over time using power law relationships.
Findings
Five fixation types identified with distinct duration profiles
Fixation durations decrease over time following power law trends
Long fixations decline and short fixations increase as task progresses
Abstract
Our interest was to evaluate changes in fixation duration as a function of time-on-task (TOT) during a random saccade task. We employed a large, publicly available dataset. The frequency histogram of fixation durations was multimodal and modelled as a Gaussian mixture. We found five fixation types. The ``ideal'' response would be a single accurate saccade after each target movement, with a typical saccade latency of 200-250 msec, followed by a long fixation (> 800 msec) until the next target jump. We found fixations like this, but they comprised only 10% of all fixations and were the first fixation after target movement only 23.4% of the time. More frequently (57.4% of the time), the first fixation after target movement was short (117.7 msec mean) and was commonly followed by a corrective saccade. Across the entire 100 sec of the task, median total fixation duration decreased. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
