High-redshift quasars at $z \geq 3$: radio variability and MPS/GPS candidates
Yu. Sotnikova (1,2,3), A. Mikhailov (1), T. Mufakharov (1,2,3), T. An, (4,5), D. Kudryavtsev (1), M. Mingaliev (1,3,6), R. Udovitskiy (1), A., Kudryashova (1), V. Stolyarov (1,7), T. Semenova (1) ((1) Special, Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences

TL;DR
This study investigates radio variability in high-redshift quasars over decades, identifying new GPS and MPS candidates and analyzing variability patterns across frequencies to understand their core emission properties.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed variability analysis of high-redshift quasars at multiple frequencies over long timescales, proposing new GPS and MPS candidates based on spectral and variability features.
Findings
Variability index ranges from 0.02 to 0.96 among quasars.
Approximately half of the quasars show blazar-like variability levels.
Identified 7 new GPS and 5 new MPS source candidates.
Abstract
We present a study of the radio variability of bright, mJy, high-redshift quasars at on timescales up to 30-40 years. The study involved simultaneous RATAN-600 measurements at frequencies of 2.3, 4.7, 8.2, 11.2, and 22.3 GHz in 2017-2020. In addition, data from the literature were used. We have found that the variability index, , which quantifies the normalized difference between the maximum and minimum flux density while accounting for measurement uncertainties, ranges from 0.02 to 0.96 for the quasars. Approximately half of the objects in the sample exhibit a variability index within the range of 0.25 to 0.50, comparable to that observed in blazars at lower redshifts. The distribution of at 22.3 GHz is significantly different from that at 2.3-11.2 GHz, which may be attributed to the fact that a compact AGN core dominates at the source's rest frame…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
