NeoRL: Efficient Exploration for Nonepisodic RL
Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Florian D\"orfler, Stelian Coros,, Andreas Krause

TL;DR
NeoRL introduces an optimistic RL approach for nonepisodic nonlinear systems, learning from a single trajectory without resets, and achieves near-optimal regret bounds with empirical success.
Contribution
The paper presents NeoRL, a novel method for nonepisodic RL that provides the first regret bounds for continuous, single-trajectory learning in nonlinear systems.
Findings
NeoRL achieves the optimal average cost in experiments.
NeoRL incurs the least regret compared to baselines.
Regret bound of O(Γ_T √T) for nonlinear systems with Gaussian process dynamics.
Abstract
We study the problem of nonepisodic reinforcement learning (RL) for nonlinear dynamical systems, where the system dynamics are unknown and the RL agent has to learn from a single trajectory, i.e., without resets. We propose Nonepisodic Optimistic RL (NeoRL), an approach based on the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty. NeoRL uses well-calibrated probabilistic models and plans optimistically w.r.t. the epistemic uncertainty about the unknown dynamics. Under continuity and bounded energy assumptions on the system, we provide a first-of-its-kind regret bound of for general nonlinear systems with Gaussian process dynamics. We compare NeoRL to other baselines on several deep RL environments and empirically demonstrate that NeoRL achieves the optimal average cost while incurring the least regret.
Peer Reviews
Decision·NeurIPS 2024 spotlight
The paper paper proposes NeoRL, which has a first-of-its-kind regret bound for general nonlinear systems with Gaussian process dynamics. The paper also proposes a practical implementation of NeoRL with MPC, which significantly outperforms baseline algorithms. The paper is very well-written and easy to follow. While the basic idea of the algorithm is not novel, the paper considers a very important topic of average RL and has a large impact on the theory of average RL, I think.
I do not see any particular weakness in this paper. Maybe one weakness is that the tightness of the derived bound is unclear because there is no lower bound for the considered setting, as the authors also mentioned in Conclusion.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization · Speech Recognition and Synthesis
MethodsGaussian Process
