Favi-Score: A Measure for Favoritism in Automated Preference Ratings for Generative AI Evaluation
Pius von D\"aniken, Jan Deriu, Don Tuggener, Mark Cieliebak

TL;DR
This paper introduces Favi-Score, a new metric to quantify favoritism in automated preference ratings for generative AI, highlighting issues with current metrics that skew evaluations and proposing a more comprehensive assessment approach.
Contribution
The paper formally defines favoritism in preference metrics and introduces Favi-Score to measure it, addressing a gap in current evaluation methods for generative AI.
Findings
Current metrics often favor specific systems, skewing evaluations.
Favoritism in metrics correlates with errors in system ranking.
Evaluating both sign accuracy and favoritism provides a more balanced assessment.
Abstract
Generative AI systems have become ubiquitous for all kinds of modalities, which makes the issue of the evaluation of such models more pressing. One popular approach is preference ratings, where the generated outputs of different systems are shown to evaluators who choose their preferences. In recent years the field shifted towards the development of automated (trained) metrics to assess generated outputs, which can be used to create preference ratings automatically. In this work, we investigate the evaluation of the metrics themselves, which currently rely on measuring the correlation to human judgments or computing sign accuracy scores. These measures only assess how well the metric agrees with the human ratings. However, our research shows that this does not tell the whole story. Most metrics exhibit a disagreement with human system assessments which is often skewed in favor of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
