Modeling the refractive index profile n(z) of polar ice for ultra-high energy neutrino experiments
S. Ali, P. Allison, S. Archambault, J.J. Beatty, D.Z. Besson, A. Bishop, P. Chen, Y.C. Chen, B.A. Clark, W. Clay, A. Connolly, K. Couberly, L. Cremonesi, A. Cummings, P. Dasgupta, R. Debolt, S. de Kockere, K.D. de Vries, C. Deaconu, M. A. DuVernois, J. Flaherty, E. Friedman

TL;DR
This paper presents an in-situ measurement of the ice's refractive index profile at the South Pole, improving neutrino detection sensitivity by modeling radio signal propagation through ice.
Contribution
It introduces a three-phase densification model for ice, validated by radio signal timing, enhancing neutrino experiment simulations and sensitivity estimates.
Findings
The three-phase model better fits the data than a single exponential model.
Using the three-phase model increases neutrino sensitivity by 14%.
Ray tracing simulations match measured radio signal timing differences.
Abstract
We have developed an in-situ index of refraction profile n(z) for cold polar ice, using the transit times of radio signals broadcast from an englacial transmitter to 2-5 km distant radio-frequency receivers, deployed at depths up to 200 m. For propagation through a non-uniform medium, Maxwell's equations generally admit two ray propagation solutions from a given transmitter, corresponding to a direct path (D) and a refracted or reflected path (R); the measured D vs. R timing differences (dt(D,R)) are determined by the refractive index profile. We constrain n(z) near South Pole, where the Askaryan Radio Array (ARA) neutrino observatory is located, by simulating D and R ray paths via ray tracing and comparing simulations to measured dt(D,R) values. Using previous ice density data as a proxy for n(z), we demonstrate that our data strongly favors a glaciologically-motivated three-phase…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
