Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline
Peng Li, Lixia Wu, Chaoqun Feng, Haoyuan Hu, Lei Fu, Jieping Ye

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel multi-objective decision-focused learning approach with new loss functions, significantly improving performance over traditional methods in multi-objective data-driven optimization tasks.
Contribution
It proposes a set of innovative loss functions tailored for multi-objective problems, addressing the limitations of existing single-objective focused methods.
Findings
Proposed method outperforms traditional two-stage approaches.
New loss functions effectively capture decision discrepancies.
Significant performance improvements demonstrated in experiments.
Abstract
Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems, characterized by unknown problem coefficients and multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional two-stage methods independently apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. The independent use of optimization solvers and prediction models may lead to suboptimal performance due to mismatches between their objectives. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem. However, these methods have primarily focused on single-objective optimization problems, thus limiting their applicability. We aim to propose a multi-objective decision-focused approach to address this gap. In order to better align with the inherent…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
They consider some loss functions to capture the discrepancies between predicted and true decision problems. They explore a particular case of web advertisement allocation within the Anonymous App, aiming to optimize overall click metrics and enhance user visitation on the following day.
1.This work proposes empirical loss functions for multi-objective decision problems without providing theoretical guarantees, and its novelty is questionable. 2.The comparison methods used in this study are outdated and do not represent the current state-of-the-art solutions for this problem. 3.The experimental validation is limited, with few datasets and relatively basic experiments, making it difficult to substantiate the method's effectiveness. 4.The related work section only covers litera
--
Your paper's main text exceeds the conference requirements, extending to page 11, which is one page over the maximum limit of 10 pages. According to the link https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers, it states "New this year, the main text must be between 6 and 10 pages (inclusive). This limit will be strictly enforced. Papers with main text on the 11th page will be desk rejected. The page limit applies to both the initial and final camera ready version." By reading your paper, we can get
This paper investigates DFL within MOP, presenting a novel problem to solve. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmark datasets and metrics.
1. The last paragraph of the paper exceeds the page limit. According to the policy, it should be desk rejected. 2. The paper is difficult to follow. The problem description lacks clarity, and the technical challenges in MOP are not well articulated, making the motivation for the proposed methods unclear. This issue is evident in all three loss components. 3. The technical contribution of the paper is not sufficiently defined. While a full page is dedicated to describing sRMMD, the derivations ar
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
