LLM-RankFusion: Mitigating Intrinsic Inconsistency in LLM-based Ranking
Yifan Zeng, Ojas Tendolkar, Raymond Baartmans, Qingyun Wu, Lizhong, Chen, Huazheng Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces LLM-RankFusion, a novel framework that reduces intrinsic inconsistencies in LLM-based ranking methods, leading to more stable and accurate passage rankings in information retrieval systems.
Contribution
The paper proposes LLM-RankFusion, a new approach that mitigates order and transitive inconsistencies in LLM-based ranking, enhancing robustness and ranking quality.
Findings
Significantly reduces inconsistent comparison results.
Improves ranking robustness and quality.
Addresses intrinsic inconsistencies in LLM-based ranking.
Abstract
Ranking passages by prompting a large language model (LLM) can achieve promising performance in modern information retrieval (IR) systems. A common approach to sort the ranking list is by prompting LLMs for a pairwise or setwise comparison which often relies on sorting algorithms. However, sorting-based methods require consistent comparisons to correctly sort the passages, which we show that LLMs often violate. We identify two kinds of intrinsic inconsistency in LLM-based pairwise comparisons: order inconsistency which leads to conflicting results when switching the passage order, and transitive inconsistency which leads to non-transitive triads among all preference pairs. Our study of these inconsistencies is relevant for understanding and improving the stability of any ranking scheme based on relative preferences. In this paper, we propose LLM-RankFusion, an LLM-based ranking…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
