Normalization and cut-elimination theorems for some logics of evidence and truth
Marcelo E. Coniglio, Mart\'in Figallo, Abilio Rodrigues

TL;DR
This paper develops proof systems for the logics of evidence and truth, proving normalization and cut-elimination theorems, which lead to decidability results for these extended non-classical logics.
Contribution
It introduces natural deduction and sequent calculi for LETJ and LETF, extending Nelson's logic N and FDE with a classicality operator, and proves key proof-theoretic properties.
Findings
Normalization and cut-elimination theorems established for both logics
Decidability of LETJ and LETF proved as a consequence
Proof systems facilitate further analysis of evidence and truth logics
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate proof-theoretic aspects of the logics of evidence and truth LETJ and LETF. These logics extend, respectively, Nelson's logic N and the logic of first-degree entailment FDE, also known as Belnap-Dunn four-valued logic, with a classicality operator that recovers classical logic for formulas in its scope. We will present natural deduction and sequent systems for LETJ and LETF, together with proofs of normalization and cut-elimination theorems, respectively. As a corollary, we obtain decidability for both logics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
