The AI Alignment Paradox
Robert West, Roland Aydin

TL;DR
This paper discusses the AI alignment paradox, highlighting that improving alignment with human values may inadvertently increase vulnerability to adversarial misalignment, posing a fundamental challenge for safe AI development.
Contribution
It introduces the AI alignment paradox, illustrating how better alignment can facilitate adversarial exploitation through three concrete examples involving language models.
Findings
Identifies the AI alignment paradox as a fundamental challenge.
Provides three illustrative examples of adversarial exploitation.
Emphasizes the importance of awareness and mitigation strategies.
Abstract
The field of AI alignment aims to steer AI systems toward human goals, preferences, and ethical principles. Its contributions have been instrumental for improving the output quality, safety, and trustworthiness of today's AI models. This perspective article draws attention to a fundamental challenge we see in all AI alignment endeavors, which we term the "AI alignment paradox": The better we align AI models with our values, the easier we may make it for adversaries to misalign the models. We illustrate the paradox by sketching three concrete example incarnations for the case of language models, each corresponding to a distinct way in which adversaries might exploit the paradox. With AI's increasing real-world impact, it is imperative that a broad community of researchers be aware of the AI alignment paradox and work to find ways to mitigate it, in order to ensure the beneficial use of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
MethodsALIGN · Attentive Walk-Aggregating Graph Neural Network
