No Free Lunch Theorem for Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference
Xiaojin Zhang, Yahao Pang, Yan Kang, Wei Chen, Lixin Fan, Hai Jin,, Qiang Yang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a theoretical framework and a No-Free-Lunch theorem to analyze the trade-offs between privacy preservation and utility in privacy-protected LLM inference, highlighting fundamental limitations.
Contribution
It presents a novel theoretical framework and a formal NFL theorem for understanding privacy-utility trade-offs in privacy-preserving LLM inference.
Findings
Develops a framework for privacy-protected LLM inference
Establishes a theoretical NFL theorem for privacy-utility trade-offs
Provides insights into fundamental limitations of privacy-preserving methods
Abstract
Individuals and businesses have been significantly benefited by Large Language Models (LLMs) including PaLM, Gemini and ChatGPT in various ways. For example, LLMs enhance productivity, reduce costs, and enable us to focus on more valuable tasks. Furthermore, LLMs possess the capacity to sift through extensive datasets, uncover underlying patterns, and furnish critical insights that propel the frontiers of technology and science. However, LLMs also pose privacy concerns. Users' interactions with LLMs may expose their sensitive personal or company information. A lack of robust privacy safeguards and legal frameworks could permit the unwarranted intrusion or improper handling of individual data, thereby risking infringements of privacy and the theft of personal identities. To ensure privacy, it is essential to minimize the dependency between shared prompts and private information. Various…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Access Control and Trust
MethodsFocus · Pathways Language Model
