Quality of Non-Convergent Best Response Processes in Multi-Agent Systems through Sink Equilibrium
Rohit Konda, Rahul Chandan, Jason Marden

TL;DR
This paper investigates sink equilibrium in multi-agent systems, providing approximation guarantees based on agent decision-making misalignment, especially when Nash equilibria are absent or hard to reach.
Contribution
It introduces a new metric of misalignment and offers theoretical bounds on sink equilibrium quality in multi-agent decision processes.
Findings
Sink equilibrium often serve as realistic attractors in multi-agent systems.
The paper establishes an approximation guarantee related to agent misalignment.
Results are demonstrated on practical multi-agent problem settings.
Abstract
Examining the behavior of multi-agent systems is vitally important to many emerging distributed applications - game theory has emerged as a powerful tool set in which to do so. The main approach of game-theoretic techniques is to model agents as players in a game, and predict the emergent behavior through the relevant Nash equilibrium. The virtue from this viewpoint is that by assuming that self-interested decision-making processes lead to Nash equilibrium, system behavior can then be captured by Nash equilibrium without studying the decision-making processes explicitly. This approach has seen success in a wide variety of domains, such as sensor coverage, traffic networks, auctions, and network coordination. However, in many other problem settings, Nash equilibrium are not necessarily guaranteed to exist or emerge from self-interested processes. Thus the main focus of the paper is on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications
