Can No-Reference Quality-Assessment Methods Serve as Perceptual Losses for Super-Resolution?
Egor Kashkarov, Egor Chistov, Ivan Molodetskikh, Dmitriy Vatolin

TL;DR
This paper explores using no-reference image quality assessment methods as perceptual losses in super-resolution, showing potential benefits but also challenges like artifacts, which can be mitigated with special training procedures.
Contribution
It is the first to investigate the use of no-reference quality assessment methods as perceptual losses in super-resolution models.
Findings
Direct optimization causes artifacts in super-resolution images.
A special training procedure reduces artifacts.
No-reference methods can serve as perceptual losses with proper training.
Abstract
Perceptual losses play an important role in constructing deep-neural-network-based methods by increasing the naturalness and realism of processed images and videos. Use of perceptual losses is often limited to LPIPS, a fullreference method. Even though deep no-reference image-qualityassessment methods are excellent at predicting human judgment, little research has examined their incorporation in loss functions. This paper investigates direct optimization of several video-superresolution models using no-reference image-quality-assessment methods as perceptual losses. Our experimental results show that straightforward optimization of these methods produce artifacts, but a special training procedure can mitigate them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Image Processing Techniques and Applications
