NeRF View Synthesis: Subjective Quality Assessment and Objective Metrics Evaluation
Pedro Martin, Antonio Rodrigues, Joao Ascenso, and Maria Paula Queluz

TL;DR
This paper thoroughly evaluates the quality of NeRF view synthesis through subjective assessments and compares various objective metrics, highlighting the importance of pose correction for accurate quality measurement.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive subjective quality assessment for NeRF view synthesis and evaluates the effectiveness of existing objective metrics in this context.
Findings
Errors in camera pose estimation affect quality assessment accuracy.
Objective metrics vary in correlation with subjective scores.
Scene type influences the performance of quality assessment methods.
Abstract
Neural radiance fields (NeRF) are a groundbreaking computer vision technology that enables the generation of high-quality, immersive visual content from multiple viewpoints. This capability has significant advantages for applications such as virtual/augmented reality, 3D modelling, and content creation for the film and entertainment industry. However, the evaluation of NeRF methods poses several challenges, including a lack of comprehensive datasets, reliable assessment methodologies, and objective quality metrics. This paper addresses the problem of NeRF view synthesis (NVS) quality assessment thoroughly, by conducting a rigorous subjective quality assessment test that considers several scene classes and recently proposed NVS methods. Additionally, the performance of a wide range of state-of-the-art conventional and learning-based full-reference 2D image and video quality assessment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsManufacturing Process and Optimization
