On equivalence of two formulas of orbital magnetic susceptibility for tight-binding models
Tomonari Mizoguchi, Nobuyuki Okuma

TL;DR
This paper proves the equivalence of two formulas for orbital magnetic susceptibility in tight-binding models, clarifying their relationship and the role of surface terms in the calculations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the equivalence of Koshino-Ando's and Gómez-Santos and Stauber's formulas, resolving a discrepancy in their apparent differences.
Findings
The two formulas are mathematically equivalent for tight-binding models.
Surface terms arising from momentum-space integration vanish despite non-periodic primitive functions.
The proof clarifies the theoretical foundation of orbital magnetic susceptibility calculations.
Abstract
We prove that two formulas of the orbital magnetic susceptibility, namely, Koshino-Ando's formula and G\'{o}mez-Santos and Stauber's formula, are equivalent for the tight-binding models. The difference between these two formulas can be written in a form containing the surface terms arising from the momentum-space integration, and we show that the surface terms are exactly vanishing although the primitive functions are seemingly non-periodic with respect to the translation by the reciprocal lattice vector.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMagnetism in coordination complexes
