
TL;DR
This paper revisits the Political Resource Curse using new data and econometric methods to better understand whether resource windfalls benefit society or have adverse effects.
Contribution
It introduces a revised analysis of the Political Resource Curse with updated data and employs advanced econometric techniques like regression discontinuity and difference-in-difference.
Findings
Resource windfalls may not always benefit society.
New econometric evidence challenges previous conclusions.
Policy implications for resource management are discussed.
Abstract
In the study of the Political Resource Curse (Brollo et al.,2013), the authors identified a new channel to investigate whether the windfalls of resources are unambiguously beneficial to society, both with theory and empirical evidence. This paper revisits the framework with a new dataset. Specifically, we implemented a regression discontinuity design and difference-in-difference specification
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Resources and Economic Development
