Bounding the softwired parsimony score of a phylogenetic network
Janosch D\"ocker, Simone Linz, Kristina Wicke

TL;DR
This paper investigates the maximum difference between the parsimony scores of phylogenetic trees within a network and the network's own score, providing bounds that depend on network complexity and character data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel bound on the difference in softwired parsimony scores for phylogenetic networks using the concept of informative blobs.
Findings
The difference is bounded by (k+1) times the network's parsimony score.
The bound is independent of alignment length and character states.
An analogous bound applies to semi-directed networks, but not for parental parsimony.
Abstract
In comparison to phylogenetic trees, phylogenetic networks are more suitable to represent complex evolutionary histories of species whose past includes reticulation such as hybridisation or lateral gene transfer. However, the reconstruction of phylogenetic networks remains challenging and computationally expensive due to their intricate structural properties. For example, the small parsimony problem that is solvable in polynomial time for phylogenetic trees, becomes NP-hard on phylogenetic networks under softwired and parental parsimony, even for a single binary character and structurally constrained networks. To calculate the parsimony score of a phylogenetic network , these two parsimony notions consider different exponential-size sets of phylogenetic trees that can be extracted from and infer the minimum parsimony score over all trees in the set. In this paper, we ask: What is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolution and Paleontology Studies · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Species Distribution and Climate Change
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
