Paths to Robust Exoplanet Science Yield Margin for the Habitable Worlds Observatory
Christopher C. Stark, Bertrand Mennesson, Steve Bryson, Eric B. Ford,, Tyler D. Robinson, Ruslan Belikov, Matthew R. Bolcar, Lee D. Feinberg,, Olivier Guyon, Natasha Latouf, Avi M. Mandell, Bernard J. Rauscher, Dan, Sirbu, Noah W. Tuchow

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the probabilistic factors affecting exoEarth candidate yields for the Habitable Worlds Observatory, emphasizing the importance of design choices and uncertainties in achieving mission goals.
Contribution
It quantifies astrophysical and sampling uncertainties in exoEarth yield predictions and explores design modifications to enhance yield and reduce observation times.
Findings
Sampling uncertainties are significant and should be included in mission planning.
Increasing telescope diameter improves exoEarth candidate yield and reduces exposure times.
Design modifications can substantially enhance the robustness of exoplanet science outcomes.
Abstract
The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) will seek to detect and characterize potentially Earth-like planets around other stars. To ensure that the mission achieves the Astro2020 Decadal's recommended goal of 25 exoEarth candidates (EECs), we must take into account the probabilistic nature of exoplanet detections and provide "science margin" to budget for astrophysical uncertainties with a reasonable level of confidence. In this study, we explore the probabilistic distributions of yields to be expected from a blind exoEarth survey conducted by such a mission. We identify and estimate the impact of all major known sources of astrophysical uncertainty on the exoEarth candidate yield. As expected, eta_Earth uncertainties dominate the uncertainty in EEC yield, but we show that sampling uncertainties inherent to a blind survey are another important source of uncertainty that should be budgeted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · History and Developments in Astronomy
