Archetype-Based Redshift Estimation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Survey
Abhijeet Anand, Julien Guy, Stephen Bailey, John Moustakas, J., Aguilar, S. Ahlen, A. Bolton, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, S., Cole, B. Dey, K. Fanning, J. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta\~naga, S. Gontcho A, Gontcho, L. Le Guillou, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett

TL;DR
This paper introduces an improved galaxy redshift estimation method for DESI that uses physical archetypes, leading to higher accuracy and fewer failures compared to existing PCA-based templates.
Contribution
The proposed archetype-based approach enhances redshift accuracy and reduces catastrophic failures, offering a more physical and robust alternative to PCA template fitting in large spectroscopic surveys.
Findings
10-30% reduction in catastrophic redshift failures
0.5-0.8% higher redshift success and purity rates for galaxies
5-40% reduction in false positive redshift estimates for sky fibers
Abstract
We present a computationally efficient galaxy archetype-based redshift estimation and spectral classification method for the Dark Energy Survey Instrument (DESI) survey. The DESI survey currently relies on a redshift fitter and spectral classifier using a linear combination of PCA-derived templates, which is very efficient in processing large volumes of DESI spectra within a short time frame. However, this method occasionally yields unphysical model fits for galaxies and fails to adequately absorb calibration errors that may still be occasionally visible in the reduced spectra. Our proposed approach improves upon this existing method by refitting the spectra with carefully generated physical galaxy archetypes combined with additional terms designed to absorb data reduction defects and provide more physical models to the DESI spectra. We test our method on an extensive dataset derived…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
