Valid Conformal Prediction for Dynamic GNNs
Ed Davis, Ian Gallagher, Daniel John Lawson, Patrick Rubin-Delanchy

TL;DR
This paper introduces a conformal prediction method for dynamic GNNs using a tensor-based unfolding representation, enabling valid uncertainty quantification without modifying existing architectures.
Contribution
It presents a mathematically rigorous approach for valid prediction sets in dynamic GNNs, applicable under minimal assumptions and adaptable to various inference scenarios.
Findings
Valid prediction sets achieved in multiple dynamic graph scenarios
Improved accuracy over baseline methods in real data experiments
Identification of failure modes when assumptions are violated
Abstract
Dynamic graphs provide a flexible data abstraction for modelling many sorts of real-world systems, such as transport, trade, and social networks. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful tools allowing for different kinds of prediction and inference on these systems, but getting a handle on uncertainty, especially in dynamic settings, is a challenging problem. In this work we propose to use a dynamic graph representation known in the tensor literature as the unfolding, to achieve valid prediction sets via conformal prediction. This representation, a simple graph, can be input to any standard GNN and does not require any modification to existing GNN architectures or conformal prediction routines. One of our key contributions is a careful mathematical consideration of the different inference scenarios which can arise in a dynamic graph modelling context. For a range of practically…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
This paper proposes an interesting approach to uncertainty quantification in the context of dynamic graph. The method that they propose is new, but leverages existing methods in the GNN and conformal prediction literature. The examples chosen by the authors are quite strong and compelling.
On the whole, I think this is a good paper, but perhaps a couple of modifications would clarify certain aspects: 1- Some of the notations could be clarified. For instance, I found the part explaining the procedure a little confusing. More specifically: - $\hat{X}^{UNF}$: since X is already used to describe features, another letter would be preferable here. I originally thought that it meant the unfolded features. - Similarly, $\hat{Y}^{UNF},$ I thought this meant the unfolded labels. - It would
1. Originality: One innovation in this paper is introducing the “unfolded” dynamic graph representation, which allows standard GNNs to process dynamic graphs while maintaining the validity of CP techniques. Additionally, the paper extends CP applications to multiple dynamic graph inference cases, for example, semi-inductive regimes, which is pretty challenging in discovering missing labels. 2. Quality and Clarity: The authors provided clean and rigorous theoretical analysis in explaining how it
1. Semi-Inductive Settings: As the authors acknowledged, the assumption of exchangeability may not hold in many real-world cases, necessary discussions for mitigating it would be appreciated. For instance, if adapting robust techniques from time-series, like basic ARIMAs, or even neural SDEs might be useful. 2. Understanding UQ: Though I acknowledged the authors’ efforts in providing extensive metrics, it would be insightful to how to interpret the size of prediction sets correlates with mea
It is interesting to use block GCN to prove the validity of applying conformal prediction on dynamic graphs. The authors provide detailed and sufficient explanations and analysis on different scenarios on dynamic graph tasks. Besides, the authors provide a variety of real data examples to show the effectiveness of their theory. The paper is well-written and organized.
This paper aims to apply conformal prediction to dynamic graphs. It should include more competitive baselines that use conformal predictions on graphs. And the backbone models should be more rather than simply using GCN and GAT.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Human Pose and Action Recognition
