The Polynomial Hierarchy does not collapse
Reiner Czerwinski

TL;DR
This paper proves that the polynomial hierarchy (PH) does not collapse by drawing parallels with the arithmetical hierarchy (AH) and demonstrating that the structure of PH remains intact under certain oracle constructions.
Contribution
It establishes that the polynomial hierarchy cannot collapse by leveraging properties of the arithmetical hierarchy and oracle-based arguments.
Findings
PH does not collapse relative to any oracle.
Languages in AH relate to levels of PH via oracle constructions.
The proof uses padding arguments and oracle simulations.
Abstract
The arithmetical hierarchy (AH) is similar to the polynomial hierarchy (PH). Unlike the PH, the AH does not collapse relative to any oracle. A language in the (k + 1)-st level of the AH is computable enumerable (c.e.) relative to the kth level. So, given an oracle in the kth level of the AH, we could use a black-box search to decide whether the input word is in the language. With very large padding arguments, i.e. the paddings grow faster than any relative to the level k of the AH computable function, we would construct a language contained in the k + 1 level of PH, if we use only a finite set of input words. From the oracle in AH, we would construct an analogue oracle at the kth level of PH. For the input words of the finite set, a word is in the language of AH, if and only if it is in the language of PH. And the input word is in the oracle set of AH, if and only if it is in the oracle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPolynomial and algebraic computation · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Logic, programming, and type systems
