
TL;DR
This paper explores the geometric structure of drawing models in probability theory using Kantorovich distances, demonstrating isometries and limits that unify classical models through a metric perspective.
Contribution
It introduces a novel metric framework for analyzing drawing operations, establishing their isometric properties and limits in the context of Kantorovich distances.
Findings
Drawing operations are isometries preserving Kantorovich distances.
As urn size increases, hypergeometric and multinomial distances converge to zero.
As draw size increases, the distance between urns and normalized multinomial draws converges to zero.
Abstract
Drawing (a multiset of) coloured balls from an urn is one of the most basic models in discrete probability theory. Three modes of drawing are commonly distinguished: multinomial (draw-replace), hypergeometric (draw-delete), and Polya (draw-add). These drawing operations are represented as maps from urns to distributions over multisets of draws. The set of urns is a metric space via the Kantorovich distance. The set of distributions over draws is also a metric space, using Kantorovich-over-Kantorovich. It is shown that these three draw operations are all isometries, that is, they exactly preserve the Kantorovich distances. Further, drawing is studied in the limit, both for large urns and for large draws. First it is shown that, as the urn size increases, the Kantorovich distances go to zero between hypergeometric and multinomial draws, and also between P\'olya and multinomial draws.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArchitecture and Computational Design
