Back to the Drawing Board for Fair Representation Learning
Ang\'eline Pouget, Nikola Jovanovi\'c, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin, Vechev

TL;DR
This paper critiques current fair representation learning evaluation practices, proposing a transfer-task-focused benchmark called TransFair to better assess the true utility and transferability of learned representations.
Contribution
It introduces TransFair, a new benchmark with calibrated transfer tasks, and advocates for transfer-based evaluation to improve fairness methods' real-world applicability.
Findings
State-of-the-art FRL methods often overfit to proxy tasks
Transfer tasks reveal limitations of current FRL approaches
Task-agnostic learning signals enhance transferability
Abstract
The goal of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) is to mitigate biases in machine learning models by learning data representations that enable high accuracy on downstream tasks while minimizing discrimination based on sensitive attributes. The evaluation of FRL methods in many recent works primarily focuses on the tradeoff between downstream fairness and accuracy with respect to a single task that was used to approximate the utility of representations during training (proxy task). This incentivizes retaining only features relevant to the proxy task while discarding all other information. In extreme cases, this can cause the learned representations to collapse to a trivial, binary value, rendering them unusable in transfer settings. In this work, we argue that this approach is fundamentally mismatched with the original motivation of FRL, which arises from settings with many downstream…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw in Society and Culture
