Interpretable Prognostics with Concept Bottleneck Models
Florent Forest, Katharina Rombach, Olga Fink

TL;DR
This paper introduces Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) for prognostics, providing inherently interpretable RUL predictions that match or outperform black-box models, with the added benefit of domain expert intervention and high-level concept explanations.
Contribution
It applies CBMs to RUL prediction, demonstrating their interpretability and competitive performance compared to traditional black-box models in prognostics.
Findings
CBMs achieve comparable or better accuracy than black-box models.
CBMs offer high interpretability through high-level concepts.
Domain experts can intervene on concept activations at test-time.
Abstract
Deep learning approaches have recently been extensively explored for the prognostics of industrial assets. However, they still suffer from a lack of interpretability, which hinders their adoption in safety-critical applications. To improve their trustworthiness, explainable AI (XAI) techniques have been applied in prognostics, primarily to quantify the importance of input variables for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) using post-hoc attribution methods. In this work, we propose the application of Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), a family of inherently interpretable neural network architectures based on concept explanations, to the task of RUL prediction. Unlike attribution methods, which explain decisions in terms of low-level input features, concepts represent high-level information that is easily understandable by users. Moreover, once verified in actual applications, CBMs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
