Comparing ImageNet Pre-training with Digital Pathology Foundation Models for Whole Slide Image-Based Survival Analysis
Kleanthis Marios Papadopoulos, Tania Stathaki

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of digital pathology foundation models like UNI and Hibou in improving Whole Slide Image-based survival analysis, comparing them to traditional ImageNet pre-trained models within MIL frameworks.
Contribution
It introduces the use of recent histopathological foundation models for survival analysis and assesses their impact on MIL network performance.
Findings
Foundation models improve baseline accuracy
Ensemble models yield higher baseline performance
Benefits diminish with complex MIL architectures
Abstract
The abundance of information present in Whole Slide Images (WSIs) renders them an essential tool for survival analysis. Several Multiple Instance Learning frameworks proposed for this task utilize a ResNet50 backbone pre-trained on natural images. By leveraging recenetly released histopathological foundation models such as UNI and Hibou, the predictive prowess of existing MIL networks can be enhanced. Furthermore, deploying an ensemble of digital pathology foundation models yields higher baseline accuracy, although the benefits appear to diminish with more complex MIL architectures. Our code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Medical Imaging and Analysis
MethodsConvolution · Kaiming Initialization · Max Pooling · Average Pooling · Global Average Pooling
