Deep Learning Calabi-Yau four folds with hybrid and recurrent neural network architectures

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that deep learning, especially RNN-based architectures, can accurately predict Hodge numbers of Calabi-Yau four-folds, outperforming CNN-based models and showing promise for mathematical physics applications.

Contribution

It introduces and evaluates hybrid CNN-RNN and pure RNN models for predicting Calabi-Yau four-fold invariants, establishing the effectiveness of RNN architectures in this domain.

Findings

RNN-based models outperform CNN-based models in accuracy.

Ensemble models improve prediction accuracy further.

High prediction accuracy (>99%) achieved for Hodge numbers.

Abstract

In this work, we report the results of applying deep learning based on hybrid convolutional-recurrent and purely recurrent neural network architectures to the dataset of almost one million complete intersection Calabi-Yau four-folds (CICY4) to machine-learn their four Hodge numbers $h^{1,1}, h^{2,1}, h^{3,1}, h^{2,2}$. In particular, we explored and experimented with twelve different neural network models, nine of which are convolutional-recurrent (CNN-RNN) hybrids with the RNN unit being either GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) or Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). The remaining four models are purely recurrent neural networks based on LSTM. In terms of the $h^{1,1}, h^{2,1}, h^{3,1}, h^{2,2}$ prediction accuracies, at 72% training ratio, our best performing individual model is CNN-LSTM-400, a hybrid CNN-LSTM with the LSTM hidden size of 400, which obtained 99.74%, 98.07%, 95.19%, 81.01%, our second best performing individual model is LSTM-448, an LSTM-based model with the hidden size of 448, which obtained 99.74%, 97.51%, 94.24%, and 78.63%. These results were improved by forming ensembles of the top two, three or even four models. Our best ensemble, consisting of the top four models, achieved the accuracies of 99.84%, 98.71%, 96.26%, 85.03%. At 80% training ratio, the top two performing models LSTM-448 and LSTM-424 are both LSTM-based with the hidden sizes of 448 and 424. Compared with the 72% training ratio, there is a significant improvement of accuracies, which reached 99.85%, 98.66%, 96.26%, 84.77% for the best individual model and 99.90%, 99.03%, 97.97%, 87.34% for the best ensemble. By nature a proof of concept, the results of this work conclusively established the utility of RNN-based architectures and demonstrated their effective performances compared to the well-explored purely CNN-based architectures in the problem of deep learning Calabi Yau manifolds.