Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the $B^0\rightarrow K^{*0}\mu^+\mu^-$ decay
LHCb collaboration: R. Aaij, A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb, C. Abellan Beteta, F. Abudin\'en, T. Ackernley, A. A. Adefisoye, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, P. Adlarson, C. Agapopoulou, C.A. Aidala, Z. Ajaltouni, S. Akar, K. Akiba, P. Albicocco, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, M. Alexander, Z. Aliouche

TL;DR
This paper performs a detailed analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the decay $B^0 ightarrow K^{*0} o K^+\pi^-\, \mu^+\,\mu^-$, utilizing LHCb data to measure interference effects and deviations from the Standard Model.
Contribution
It introduces a novel model for both one-particle and two-particle nonlocal amplitudes, analyzing the full dimuon mass spectrum without vetoes, and provides the first direct measurement of the $b s au au$ vector coupling.
Findings
Interference with nonlocal contributions is larger than predicted but has minor impact on Wilson coefficients.
The Wilson coefficient $C_9$ shows a 2.1$\sigma$ deviation from the Standard Model.
Other Wilson coefficients are in better agreement with the Standard Model, with a global significance of 1.5$\sigma$.
Abstract
A comprehensive study of the local and nonlocal amplitudes contributing to the decay is performed by analysing the phase-space distribution of the decay products. The analysis is based on collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 8.4fb collected by the LHCb experiment. This measurement employs for the first time a model of both one-particle and two-particle nonlocal amplitudes, and utilises the complete dimuon mass spectrum without any veto regions around the narrow charmonium resonances. In this way it is possible to explicitly isolate the local and nonlocal contributions and capture the interference between them. The results show that interference with nonlocal contributions, although larger than predicted, only has a minor impact on the Wilson Coefficients determined from the fit to the data. For the local…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
