Gravitational Wave Cosmology: Be Careful of the Black Hole Mass Spectrum
Gr\'egoire Pierra

TL;DR
This paper highlights potential biases in gravitational wave-based measurements of the universe's expansion due to simplistic black hole mass models, emphasizing the need for more adaptable models to improve accuracy.
Contribution
It demonstrates that heuristic black hole mass models can bias Hubble constant estimates and advocates for more flexible models in future GW cosmology research.
Findings
Biases up to 3 sigma in Hubble constant estimates with 2000 GW detections
Heuristic mass models fail to account for redshift evolution and unexpected mass features
Flexible source mass models are necessary for accurate cosmological inferences
Abstract
Gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binary coalescences (CBCs) offer insights into the universe expansion. The spectral siren method, used without electromagnetic counterparts (EMC), infers cosmic expansion (Hubble constant) by relating detector and source frame masses of black hole (BH) mergers. However, heuristic mass models (broken power law, power law plus peak, multipeak) may introduce biases in the Hubble constant estimation, potentially up to 3 sigma with 2000 detected GW mergers. These biases stem from the models inability to consider redshift evolution and unexpected mass features. Future GW cosmology studies should employ adaptable source mass models to address these issues.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
