Tokenization Matters! Degrading Large Language Models through Challenging Their Tokenization
Dixuan Wang, Yanda Li, Junyuan Jiang, Zepeng Ding, Ziqin Luo, Guochao Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Deqing Yang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that tokenization flaws significantly impair large language models' understanding, especially in Chinese, by creating an adversarial dataset that exposes vulnerabilities and degrades model performance.
Contribution
The authors introduce ADT, an adversarial dataset challenging LLM tokenization, revealing its impact on model accuracy and demonstrating an effective automatic data generation method.
Findings
ADT effectively challenges tokenization in leading LLMs
Tokenization flaws significantly degrade LLM performance
Automatic data generation is efficient and robust
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. Nonetheless, it was also witnessed that LLMs tend to produce inaccurate responses to specific queries. This deficiency can be traced to the tokenization step LLMs must undergo, which is an inevitable limitation inherent to all LLMs. In fact, incorrect tokenization is the critical point that hinders LLMs in understanding the input precisely, thus leading to unsatisfactory output. This defect is more obvious in Chinese scenarios. To demonstrate this flaw of LLMs, we construct an adversarial dataset, named as , which draws upon the vocabularies of various open-source LLMs to challenge LLMs' tokenization. ADT consists of two subsets: the manually constructed ADT-Human and the automatically generated ADT-Auto. Our empirical results reveal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling
