Training-Conditional Coverage Bounds under Covariate Shift
Mehrdad Pournaderi, Yu Xiang

TL;DR
This paper develops bounds on the reliability of conformal prediction sets under covariate shift, providing PAC guarantees for training-conditional coverage that depend on distributional change severity and dataset size.
Contribution
It introduces the first bounds on training-conditional coverage for conformal methods under covariate shift, enhancing understanding of their reliability.
Findings
Provides upper bounds on the tail of training-conditional coverage distribution.
Characterizes how distributional change severity affects coverage reliability.
Offers PAC guarantees for conformal prediction under covariate shift.
Abstract
Conformal prediction methodology has recently been extended to the covariate shift setting, where the distribution of covariates differs between training and test data. While existing results ensure that the prediction sets from these methods achieve marginal coverage above a nominal level, their coverage rate conditional on the training dataset (referred to as training-conditional coverage) remains unexplored. In this paper, we address this gap by deriving upper bounds on the tail of the training-conditional coverage distribution, offering probably approximately correct (PAC) guarantees for these methods. Our results characterize the reliability of the prediction sets in terms of the severity of distributional changes and the size of the training dataset.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
