AT2020ohl: its nature and probable implications

TL;DR

This paper investigates the ambiguous nuclear transient AT2020ohl in galaxy NGC6297, analyzing multi-wavelength data to understand its origin, likely linked to accretion activity near a supermassive black hole, with implications for galaxy merger processes.

Contribution

It provides a detailed multi-wavelength analysis of AT2020ohl, proposing accretion disk activity as its origin and suggesting a possible connection to galaxy merger and binary SMBH systems.

Findings

Radio counterpart detected 111 and 313 days after discovery

Evidence suggests the host galaxy is a merger remnant

The SMBH mass is approximately 1.2×10^7 solar masses

Abstract

ASASSN-20hx, a.k.a AT2020ohl, is an ambiguous nuclear transient (ANT), which was discovered in the nearby galaxy NGC6297 by the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN). We have investigated the evolution of AT2020ohl using a multi-wavelength dataset to explain the geometry of the system and the energy radiated by it between X-ray and radio wavelengths. Our X-ray, UV/optical, and radio observations of the object jointly clarify the association of AT2020ohl with the nuclear activity of NGC6297. We detected radio counterpart of AT2020ohl 111 days and 313 days after the discovery in Jansky Very Large Array X-band with flux densities 47$\pm$14 $\mu$Jy and 34$\pm$3 $\mu$Jy, respectively. Using multi-wavelength data analysis, we nullify the possibility of associating any stellar disruption process with this event. We found some evidence showing that the host galaxy is a merger remnant, so the possibility of a binary SMBH system can not be ruled out. The central SMBH has a mass of $\sim1.2\times10^7$ M$_\odot$. We propose the accretion disk activity as the origin of AT2020ohl $-$ it is either due to disk accretion event onto the central SMBH or due to the sudden accretion activity in a preexisting accretion disk of the system during the interaction of two SMBHs which became gravitationally bound during a merger process. However, we also admit that with the existing dataset, it is impossible to say definitively, among these two probabilities, which one is the origin of this nuclear transient.