Dimension-free deterministic equivalents and scaling laws for random feature regression
Leonardo Defilippis, Bruno Loureiro, Theodor Misiakiewicz

TL;DR
This paper derives a non-asymptotic, dimension-free deterministic equivalent for the test error of random feature ridge regression, enabling precise analysis of generalization performance and scaling laws.
Contribution
It introduces a general deterministic equivalent for RFRR test error that is independent of feature dimension and validated empirically, advancing understanding of high-dimensional random feature models.
Findings
Deterministic equivalent accurately predicts test error across datasets
Sharp excess error rates under power-law spectral assumptions
Identifies minimal feature count for optimal minimax error
Abstract
In this work we investigate the generalization performance of random feature ridge regression (RFRR). Our main contribution is a general deterministic equivalent for the test error of RFRR. Specifically, under a certain concentration property, we show that the test error is well approximated by a closed-form expression that only depends on the feature map eigenvalues. Notably, our approximation guarantee is non-asymptotic, multiplicative, and independent of the feature map dimension -- allowing for infinite-dimensional features. We expect this deterministic equivalent to hold broadly beyond our theoretical analysis, and we empirically validate its predictions on various real and synthetic datasets. As an application, we derive sharp excess error rates under standard power-law assumptions of the spectrum and target decay. In particular, we provide a tight result for the smallest number…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace and Expression Recognition · Statistical Methods and Inference
