On (shape-)Wilf-equivalence of certain sets of (partially ordered) patterns
Alexander Burstein, Tian Han, Sergey Kitaev, Philip Zhang

TL;DR
This paper proves a conjecture on Wilf-equivalence of specific pattern sets, extending known results and establishing broad classes of pattern equivalences using generalized shape-Wilf-equivalence techniques.
Contribution
It introduces generalized shape-Wilf-equivalence results and proves a significant conjecture, expanding the understanding of pattern equivalences in combinatorics.
Findings
Proved the conjecture of Gao and Kitaev on Wilf-equivalence of two pattern sets.
Established shape-Wilf-equivalence for large classes of patterns.
Extended previous results to include 11 out of 12 classes related to the conjecture.
Abstract
We prove a conjecture of Gao and Kitaev on Wilf-equivalence of sets of patterns {12345,12354} and {45123,45213} that extends the list of 10 related conjectures proved in the literature in a series of papers. To achieve our goals, we prove generalized versions of shape-Wilf-equivalence results of Backelin, West, and Xin and use a particular result on shape-Wilf-equivalence of monotone patterns. We also derive general results on shape-Wilf-equivalence of certain classes of partially ordered patterns and use their specialization (also appearing in a paper by Bloom and Elizalde) as an essential piece in proving the conjecture. Our results allow us to show (shape-)Wilf-equivalence of large classes of sets of patterns, including 11 out of 12 classes found by Bean et al. in relation to the conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptics and Image Analysis
