Improving Fairness and Mitigating MADness in Generative Models
Paul Mayer, Lorenzo Luzi, Ali Siahkoohi, Don H. Johnson, Richard G., Baraniuk

TL;DR
This paper proposes a hypernetwork-based training approach for generative models that enhances fairness, stability, and reduces bias, supported by theoretical analysis and empirical validation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel hypernetwork training framework that improves fairness, stability, and bias mitigation in generative models, along with a scalable implementation for various architectures.
Findings
Models trained with hypernetworks are more fair for minority classes.
Hypernetwork training leads to more stable generative models under MAD conditions.
The approach reduces statistical bias in learned parameters.
Abstract
Generative models unfairly penalize data belonging to minority classes, suffer from model autophagy disorder (MADness), and learn biased estimates of the underlying distribution parameters. Our theoretical and empirical results show that training generative models with intentionally designed hypernetworks leads to models that 1) are more fair when generating datapoints belonging to minority classes 2) are more stable in a self-consumed (i.e., MAD) setting, and 3) learn parameters that are less statistically biased. To further mitigate unfairness, MADness, and bias, we introduce a regularization term that penalizes discrepancies between a generative model's estimated weights when trained on real data versus its own synthetic data. To facilitate training existing deep generative models within our framework, we offer a scalable implementation of hypernetworks that automatically generates a…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
- Novel theoretical contribution connecting statistical bias in MLE to fairness and MADness issues in generative models - Comprehensive empirical validation across multiple types of distributions and models (VAE, BigGAN) - Strong technical foundation with clear connections to existing statistical theory - Results show meaningful improvements in both fairness metrics and stability against MADness
- The motivation and problem setup in the introduction is not well structured, making it difficult to grasp the core contribution initially - Limited ablation studies on the choice of hyperparameters (e.g., PLE penalty $\lambda$=0.1) - Some experimental results show inconsistent trends across different distributions without sufficient explanation - The presentation could be more accessible to readers less familiar with statistical estimation theory
1. The paper is well-written and addresses important problems in generative models. 2. The proposed method is intuitive and easy to understand. 3. The experiments are well conducted and demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.
The paper lacks discussion and comparisons with existing bias mitigation methods in generative models. The authors could consider the following methods and explain how their method differs conceptually from these existing approaches and provide empirical comparisons that can support the benefit of the proposed method in the considered setup: - Xu, Depeng, et al. "Fairgan: Fairness-aware generative adversarial networks." 2018 IEEE international conference on big data (big data). IEEE, 2018. - Ch
+ The overall paper is well-structured and clearly written, with concise explanations that make concepts like hypernetworks and MADness accessible to a broader readers. + This paper tackles an important and timely issue by addressing fairness and bias in generative models, particularly focusing on challenges such as minority class penalization and model autophagy disorder (MADness). + The discussion related to large language models (LLMs) adds practical relevance to this research, as the conte
- The experiments are relatively weak, especially given the small dataset and the older models used (VAE and BigGAN). It would strengthen the paper significantly if the method were tested on diffusion models. - There is extensive discussion of ChatGPT and other LLMs in Section 1.3. It would enhance the paper if the proposed method could be applied directly to LLMs.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
MethodsHyperNetwork
