Node-Time Conditional Prompt Learning In Dynamic Graphs
Xingtong Yu, Zhenghao Liu, Xinming Zhang, Yuan Fang

TL;DR
This paper introduces DYGPROMPT, a novel prompt learning framework for dynamic graphs that captures evolving node-time patterns, bridging the gap between pre-training and downstream tasks like node classification.
Contribution
It proposes dual prompts and dual condition-nets to better model temporal dynamics and task objectives in dynamic graph neural networks.
Findings
Outperforms existing methods on four public datasets.
Effectively captures evolving node-time interactions.
Bridges the gap between pre-training and downstream tasks.
Abstract
Dynamic graphs capture evolving interactions between entities, such as in social networks, online learning platforms, and crowdsourcing projects. For dynamic graph modeling, dynamic graph neural networks (DGNNs) have emerged as a mainstream technique. However, they are generally pre-trained on the link prediction task, leaving a significant gap from the objectives of downstream tasks such as node classification. To bridge the gap, prompt-based learning has gained traction on graphs, but most existing efforts focus on static graphs, neglecting the evolution of dynamic graphs. In this paper, we propose DYGPROMPT, a novel pre-training and prompt learning framework for dynamic graph modeling. First, we design dual prompts to address the gap in both task objectives and temporal variations across pre-training and downstream tasks. Second, we recognize that node and time features mutually…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
S1. I like the idea of using dual prompt mechanism to bridge task and temporal gaps. S2. Experiments show DYGPROMPT is effective on small real-world graphs.
W1. The introduction of dual prompts and dual condition networks enhances adaptability but significantly increases model complexity. I would suggest the authors to add some analysis or experiments to demonstrate DYGPROMPT’s performance in terms of computational efficiency. W2. I have concerns about the experimental setup. Using the first 80% of interactions for pre-training is uncommon in pre-trained frameworks. For example, TIGPROMPT uses only 20% of the data, yielding surprisingly strong resu
- **Relevance to Real-World Applications:** The framework's focus on dynamic graphs makes it highly relevant to real-world applications such as social networks, online learning platforms, and crowdsourcing projects. - **Parameter Efficiency:** DYGPROMPT's ability to perform well with minimal parameter updates is a significant strength, especially for applications where labeled data is scarce. - **Open source:** It is commendable that the authors have made their code publicly available, enhanci
- **Motivation:** The motivation for this work is insufficiently justified. After reading the paper, it remains unclear why temporal patterns would be influenced by node features. Time, as a continuous scale, is inherently objective and independent of specific events. - **Novelty:** Based on the above, the novelty of this work appears limited. TIGPrompt has already proposed an effective strategy for dynamic graph learning by fusing prompts through the concatenation of node and time embeddings f
1. This paper identifies the issue of pretrained Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)—specifically, the gap between pre-training and task objectives—and proposes novel prompt learning approaches for dynamic graphs. It also considers the evolving interplay patterns between nodes and time points. 2. The framework addresses temporal variations across time and divergent task objectives by leveraging a node prompt and a time prompt to reduce the gap between the pre-training and downstream phases. The main no
1. The concept of temporal prompts for dynamic graphs has been previously investigated (e.g., TIGPrompt), but the differences between approaches are not clearly articulated. In the related work, it is stated that “it only considers the temporal factor in node features, overlooking that temporal patterns are also influences by node features.” More explanations are needed to highlight the technical novelty of this paper. 2. The overall framework presented in Figure 2 could be improved; it is not c
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Topic Modeling
MethodsFocus
