Comparisons of Sequential Experiments for Additively Separable Problems
Mark Whitmeyer, Cole Williams

TL;DR
This paper establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for one sequential experiment to dominate another across various classes of dynamic decision problems, focusing on the timing of information in additively separable problems.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for comparing sequential experiments in additively separable, discounted, and fixed discount factor problems.
Findings
Conditions for experiment dominance are characterized precisely.
Timing of information arrival impacts decision preferences.
Results apply broadly across different dynamic decision problem classes.
Abstract
For three natural classes of dynamic decision problems; 1. additively separable problems, 2. discounted problems, and 3. discounted problems for a fixed discount factor; we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for one sequential experiment to dominate another in the sense that the dominant experiment is preferred to the other for any decision problem in the specified class. We use these results to study the timing of information arrival in additively separable problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
